January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 08:16 pm
I had a Thought today. (I don’t get many of those any more because my head’s too full of household and toddler stuff, so this was quite exciting.)
 
I’ve been re-reading two of my favourite books ever: The Moonspinners and My Brother Michael by Mary Stewart. They are two of the first adult books I ever read aged about 12 and there was a lot I didn’t really understand in them at that age, but I thought I’d discovered everything I could in them in subsequent re-readings. I have probably read each of them at least a dozen times, but it’s been a few years since the last time so I thought I’d give them another go, because they both have absolutely gorgeous heroes, the kind of man I have always fancied for myself (even though my real life husband is nothing like them and I love him to bits): extremely self-confident, casually cool, and very protective of their women.
 
Anyway, boy was I wrong when I thought I had nothing left to discover in these books. Not only do I now actually understand a lot of the (1960s) slang in The Moonspinners due to having watched a lot more tv in recent years, but I also understood a lot more of the heroines’ feelings about their menfolk. MS actually writes quite understatedly about girls falling in love and because I was so very young and inexperienced in that area for the first several formative readings of the books, I really didn’t realise what she was writing about. It’s quite a shock to realise how much of these stories I was missing out on!
 
But my main discovery was this: both these books have a lot of what I’ve always termed “good bits”. A somewhat loose term, I’ll admit, but then I never could tie down what common factor the “good bits” in these and other books (and on tv).  Some “good bits” are the sections where exciting or terrifying things happen to the characters – getting kidnapped, or tied-up, or threatened etc. (are we seeing the theme here?). However, other bits were less easy to define. But today I got it. They’re bits where the hero (usually the hero) shows his dominant side.  I'm talking about the subtle demonstrations of power, here: just the odd comment in a conversation, or when he's just being incredibly cool.
 
I always knew I enjoyed the obvious descriptions of sub/dom behaviour, long before I knew what on earth that was. But even in the last few years when I’ve been reading more and more fanfic – which does tend to concentrate on this area! – I never thought of applying knowledge of that kind of behaviour to stories not overtly written about it, if you see what I mean. Mary Stewart’s heroines really do tend to go for dominant heroes – in fact, I suppose a lot of fictional heroes are dominant types, because that’s what’s exciting to the reader – I just never realised it before! And I’m so glad because now I finally know why I like those bits so much, and I’m going to have great fun re-reading stuff in the light of my new knowledge!
 
OK, that was really rambling and probably didn’t make a lot of sense, but that’s my head for you.
Monday, March 19th, 2007 01:16 pm (UTC)
Colin - *so* glad you told me his name, it was bugging me to the point I was thinking about trying to find my copy of the book.

It's good for me to think outside my own box about this; and fanfic reading is teaching me to be a more observant reader overall. Hmmm, Dick Francis, too?

LJ is *so* cool - I hope you grow to love it here as much as I do! I only know some TS people, so far, but they're a totally lovely bunch of folks. And there's so much to explore here, and it's all very addictive... :-)